Families' Distress Regarding Shoreline Degradation Threatening Norfolk Burial Sites
Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.
An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.
A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Past
A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”
“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy
Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.
“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”
In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Seeking Solutions and Certainty
An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.
Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”
He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”
The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.